|
[Previous entry: "Why I was, and am, in favour of this war"] [Main Index] [Next entry: "Communiqué from the Home Front"]
30 March 2003: "In defence of HRW"
I think Steven den Beste is a wee bit rough in his assessment of Human Rights Watch. I developed a deep respect for HRW during my time with ICTY, and Den Beste's claim that HRW is "deeply concerned about human rights abuse as long as it's not by anyone opposing the US" is, in my experience, rubbish. HRW compiled some damn fine dossiers of material on everybody involved in the Yugoslav wars, and not too long ago it was vehemently protesting the election of Libya to the chair of the UN Human Rights Commission.
HRW, I believe, does not like to cry wolf; they don't issue reports until they've got a picture of what's going on. And right now, it's hard to tell what is going in Iraq. As for what had already happened in Iraq, check out this link. It's a shame Den Beste evidently didn't.
That said, he's probably spot-on as far as Amnesty International is concerned.
|
Navigation:
home
archives
backgrounder
e-mail
Blogs:
au currant
Black Decaf
The Illiterati
Cointelpro Tool
Norman Geras
A Fistful of Euros
Harry's Place
Plastic Gangster
Blogfonte
Tim Newman
€urosavant
Crooked Timber
Gallowglass
Mr. McGillicuddy
eameljenet
Civax
101-280
Colby Cosh
Peaktalk
Mick Hartley
Oliver Kamm
Miscellanea:












Care to contribute to the coffee fund?
|